Sinofinancialization and Urban Change in East Africa (Marie Sklodowska Curie Action)

SURGE is a Marie Sklodowska-Curie project addressing urban transformation driven by private Chinese capitals in Africa.

Current research on Africa-China relationships focuses on major government-driven investments, such as the Belt and Road initiative, which is the most recent example of China’s increasing presence in Africa. Scholarly attention is thus directed toward the state and the continental scale, overlooking private and provincial Chinese investments in Africa and their consequences on cities. Very little is known about non-state-driven financial operations of Chinese entrepreneurs, or about the responses of African cities to the influx of Chinese capitals.

SURGE addresses these knowledge gaps with an urban ethnography of the sinofinancialization of two African cities that offer two different models of China’s involvement in Africa: Addis Ababa, for manufacturing, and Nairobi, for high-value services. The research will explore the key urban sites of these financial operations: special economic zones, new towns, technology hubs and master-planned estates, charting the spatial and economic consequences of private Chinese capitals in the making of 21st-century African urban worlds.



Chief investigator


Francesca Governa, Dr. Liza Rosa Cirolia (African Centre for Cities - UCT)

Advisory board

Prof. Fran Tonkinss (LSE), Prof. Brett Neilson (WSU), Prof. Sue Parnell (Bristol University)


#UrbanGeography #Global Urbanism


Research project

China (as PRC)-Africa relationships date back to the post-World War II period, when Maoist foreign policy involved support for anti-colonial liberation movements. The alliance between PRC and African countries was sealed by several economic and political partnerships that were predicated on the principles of non-interference, non-conditionality, equality, and mutual benefit, in explicit contrast with European and American aid policies. However, following Deng’s market reforms of the 80s, Chinese engagement in Africa took a stronger economic turn, especially as China’s ‘go out’ strategy of the late 90s brought with it a need for natural resources which African countries could readily supply. Since then, in spite of proclaimed political-equality and mutual-benefit principles, China’s economic presence has become more and more assertive. This relationship was recently confirmed by the current Beijing Action Plan, which officially launched Africa’s section of the Belt and Road initiative (BRI). In the context of this plan, East-African cities and ports will become crucial nodes connecting Western China to Europe, through the ‘blue’ corridor of the maritime silk road.

These accelerated rapports of economic and political partnership have generated much interest in the development and international relations scholarships. A wealth of literature has addressed the differences and continuities between Chinese developmental FDI and Euroamerican forms of economic engagement, the perils of predatory investment and debt, and the resource-driven paths of Chinese capitals. However, it remains to be understood how smaller operations of private Chinese capital work in relation to major, state-driven investments and corporations in the field of infrastructure and resource extraction, and how these operations are spatialized in the African cities that lie on the 21st century maritime silk road.

As a qualitative ethnography of the operations of private Chinese finance, SURGE thus addresses the following questions, using Addis Ababa (Ethiopia) and Nairobi (Kenya) as case-study cities:

  1. What are the characteristics of Chinese financial operations that escape the framework of major state-driven investments within the BRI, AIIB (Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank), or FOCAC (Forum on China-Africa Cooperation)? And how do these ancillary financial operations relate to main BRI and AIIB investments?
  2. How are these financial operations spatialized in Addis Ababa and Nairobi (for example, through special economic zones in the first, and through technology hubs in the latter)? What is their impact on the urban fabric and politics of these cities?
  3. How do these financial operations relate to previous forms of international economic development and earlier Chinese engagement in the making of African cities?
  4. How are Addis Ababa and Nairobi responding to the influx of private Chinese capitals, especially with respect to their commitment to the urban justice principles of Goal 11 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)? What type of responses are these cities producing to attract and harness these financial operations?

To answer the empirical questions, the research will focus on three typologies of Chinese investment: manufacturing zones (especially in Addis Ababa), seed and venture capital (especially in Nairobi’s fintech ecosystem) and speculative real estate, especially in the form of master-planned estates (in both cities).